You alright? Do you need us to call someone for you OP?

>>1061
No u
safe

Maybe this is just me but I feel like the uncanny valley has an important utility for keeping the attention of normie simps and their harpy masters pointed elsewhere. The horrifying ones should be kept on the front lines because it's a lot more reasonable than heads on pikes. >via >>9

>>5003 >The horrifying ones should be kept on the front lines because it's a lot more reasonable than heads on pikes. Heh, fair enough. You may have a good point Anon. Any one have good suggestions for a few ghoulish /robowaifu/ PR 'pretty' faces?

>>5003 How do you want to do recruitment and scaring people away at the same time?!? This whole idea of "they'll come for us" might be quite self-defeating. It might be hindering us, without having any effect. It's impossible to keep this development a secret, while people which are even not involved in development, like MGTOW and other YouTube channel speculating about it and reporting on ever progress every day, while using it to mock everyone who might be affected by it. It can't really be stopped in free societies anyways.

>>5005 >This whole idea of "they'll come for us" might be quite self-defeating. This is getting away from the topic but I just can't ignore how bad of a take this is. I feel like most people on here would know what I'm talking about. The cloning of Dolly the Sheep was a scientific breakthrough that threatened the gynocentric monopoly on reproduction. It became a massive ethical controversy and nothing like that has gotten similar attention since. Men started paying too much money and attention to something that they can't put their dick in. Then gamergate happened. When someone gets a little too good at drawing titties, fucking drawing them, women feel existentially threatened and you end up with pic related and manga artists begging their legislators to preserve their culture. ffs they killed Luke Skywalker and dragged his name through the mud. These people are on the war path and it will come to you eventually. Developments in /robowaifu/ will grow and become more ubiquitous and being aware of what that means is not self-defeating it's just realistic. If you want peace, then prepare for war. It's that bloody simple.

>>5006 I don't disagree with the idea that some powerful groups of people will at least try to push back against what we're trying to archive I just wanted to argue for caution how the fear of that might affect our decisions. We can't hide what we're doing and we shouldn't limit ourselves out of such fear. However, If someone wanted to create a domestic helper bot which doesn't really look good on purpose, and put that out as a showcase and distraction, then I'm not opposed to that. Same for cute companions which aren't for sex, and don't look like rivals to women.

>>5006 I'm not the guy you replied to, but I understand where you're coming from. However, we shouldn't let that limit our long term goal of creating beautiful robowaifu companions. There was always going to be opposistion. In fact, there already is. Check out "Campaign against sex robots" and Kathleen Richardson on YouTube. The opposition is already organized, just not popular. Right now people see them as a fringe feminist group. Here is their twitter: https://twitter.com/RobotCampaign Eventually, once a robowaifu-esque robot gets beautiful enough and functionally skilled enough to be a threat, it'll cause a lot of women to take a strong feminist stance against robot companions. I feel this is what you want to prevent, but I feel it is inevitable. There may be a time for us to hunker down and focus on self-preservation but I don't think that is now. I think you are right about preparing for a cultural war, but there are so few of us. Right now we need more allies. I think being able to produce attractive robot companions will be a bigger recruiting mechanism than anything else. Personally, I prefer the mecha-musume look over trying to perfectly replicate a human, but at the same time we have to avoid uncanniness where we can. I've been thinking of robot designs with a visor over the eyes rather than having some human-like facsimile. With a balance of human form and mecha parts it'll be hard for feminists and their ilk to create a convincing narrative against us. What they think isn't entirely important. The important thing is that we have enough supporters to challenge their stance in the public mind. We should prioritize making allies over minimizing enemies.

>>5009 I am not concerned about feminists at all. 3D printing has made it impossible to stop people from making parts at home. If you are determined enough and willing to learn some electronics, you can pretty much create something that is a radical feminist's nightmare XD. They'll probably try to have the sale of servo and stepper motors banned or something.

Thanks to the mod to move this in the right thread. >>5009 Yeah, there are already enemies. I'm not saying we shouldn't be aware of them. There's no big disagreement here. The will rather try to obstruct us with DDOS attacks, FUD, Spam, Shaming, trying to turn other groups of men against us, ... Legally they might try to use overreach of government for the protection of children by claiming this would be related, etc. Our advantages are for example Open Source, uncontrollable imports, freedom protecting laws, parties which want male voters, and the culture of sexual liberalism. Eventually, I'm quite sure politicians are more concerned with Incels going on a killing spree than them sitting at home playing with their Waifu. Just let us not get crippled by some fear about our enemies, wasting time on speculations or making decisions based on that. Btw, some of the thread on 4chan were very telling in regard of how some enemies try to obstruct this. However, that aside this was such a waste of time to read, which is why I wont link to those threads. Some of the surprising FUD was the someone claiming there were patents preventing this. At least I thought this was FUD, but might be true to some extent for companies regarding patent trolls.

I suppose the conversation being relocated makes sense. That means we can talk about this more. I'd like to expand on things a little since its fitting for the theme of this new thread. The women/feminists don't want to lose their (near)monopoly over male sexual interest. Think about how far men go just to have the CHANCE at being with a beautiful woman. Feminists are always quick to say that they don't need men but men actually invest a lot into the women they love. There are guys who financially support their girlfriends/wives through college. There are guys that financially support their sugarbabies from poorer countries. There are guys that support the lifestyles of their girlfriends that just make less than them. These are just a few of the direct ways men support women. That's not even mentioning the indirect ways such as the welfare state. I don't think the feminists are open-minded enough to articulate these things. I think they just notice the potential competition and are trying to shut it down before it begins. Imagine what will happen if you took just a portion of the overall resources men provide to women and put it towards robowaifus. It'd be amazing! I think robowaifu development would explode. More investment in the field would allow for better robowaifus, and better robowaifus would encourage more investment. Groups like Campaign Against Sex Robots don't have many members now, but as robot companions become serious competitors with human women then there will be a massive shift. They will join groups like that in droves. >>5010 I think they probably understand they'll never be able to ban motors/3D printers since they have other uses. It would be a bad hill for them to die on. I think what they'll do is 1. Try to shame men for purchasing/developing robowaifus and 2. Get the government involved in robowaifu market transactions. They'll probably try to get the government to ban robot companions having a sexuality outright. They'll claim it corrupts men and harms children or something. The problem is that the government might actually hear them out because women make up a huge percentage of active voters. When robot companion tech becomes that advanced this is going to be a huge battle of public perception. What do you guys think?

>>5013 Yes, I think we're thinking on the same wavelength for the most part. The only thing I will question is the incel part. I'm not sure the government really cares about the incel thing altogether. It seems like politicians and the media try to take advantage of the lone-shooter situations more than provide an actual solution. That could just be me being pessimistic though. I get the feeling that the government couldn't care less about incels or lonely males in general. Its a powder keg waiting to explode. Also, one thing I want to note that might actually get the government to support robowaifu companions is the potential for military applications. They probably won't use the same models of course, but the development of humanoid companion robots could make humanoid combat robots more realistic in the future. There are a lot of tech barriers to overcome of course, but this could be one thing we have in our favour. I could see old politicians wanting to blindly ban or "Regulate" robowaifus based on their own biases, but when military tech development is on the line they might be more hesitant.

>>1061 Its afraid.

>>5014 >They'll probably try to get the government to ban robot companions having a sexuality outright. This would only create more attention, without any success. Doing this would be against the culture of sexual freedom and threaten all progress there, in US maybe also against freem protecting rights. Also, how would this be enforced? Police checking out humanoid robots under their clothes? Also, the risks would be imense. Imaging getting your Waifu seized by police...

>>5020 Yeah, banning robot sexuality would mean that there'd be a massive black market for "upgrade kits" and it would also kinda fly in the face of the fact that people nowadays are allowed to identify as transgender, homosexual, bisexual etc. I can see the problem with making children robots (too similar to pedophilia), but my guess is that will be policed in a similar way to how it is now. Also smaller robots will likely be even more expensive due to the difficulty in producing really miniaturized parts. Hopefully we can eventually manufacture robowaifus that are so beautiful and useful that even senators want one. Eventually who knows? Maybe one day the White House will get a very pretty and intelligent receptionist with in-built radio comms and CCTV? :D

>>5020 I was actually thinking of them trying to banning it at the manufacturer/retail level. But you're right, that would be impossible to enforce when the robots are out in the wild. Like >>5028 said, it would cause a signifcant black market. You both raised good points. I still think they'll do whatever they can to force the market underground into these black markets. Did you hear about that sex doll brothel that was set to open in Texas a while back? They managed to get that one banned before it ever opened. https://www.change.org/p/elijah-rising-keep-robot-brothels-out-of-houston https://www.thedailybeast.com/houston-lawmakers-aim-to-block-first-us-sex-robot-brothel This case is different since those are dolls rather than robots and owned by a business rather than individuals. My point is that women won't just lie down and accept beautiful robot companions. Our society(here in the US) is increasingly gynocentric and we can't ignore that. They always try to claim that robots/dolls objectifies women somehow, which is silly. If anything, it womanizes an object. If you've got some time the comments on that petition are interesting, in a way. It's eye opening to see what the opposition thinks. It seems they always use "Objectification", "Think of the children!", and "Muh morals!". It's kind of funny that women are talking about morals on that page while being totally degenerate elsewhere.

This is an important and interesting topic, so I thought I'd weigh in here as well. >I feel like the uncanny valley has an important utility for keeping the attention of normie simps and their harpy masters pointed elsewhere. While possibly a valid observation, it's a strictly temporary expedient. Artists will always strive to achieve their best if they are in any way healthy men. The eventual arrival of beautiful robowaifus is inevitable, so we may as well all prepare for the ramifications of that fact. >Developments in /robowaifu/ will grow and become more ubiquitous and being aware of what that means is not self-defeating it's just realistic. If you want peace, then prepare for war. It's that bloody simple. This, basically. History is rife with this wisdom. >Right now we need more allies. I think being able to produce attractive robot companions will be a bigger recruiting mechanism than anything else. Both true. Personally, I certainly don't advise us to hold back in any way in our efforts at creating beauty. God made us to do so. >...the mecha-musume look >With a balance of human form and mecha parts it'll be hard for feminists and their ilk to create a convincing narrative against us. Moe anthropomorphism is a reasonable approach in general, but anything too neotenous will certainly become a Won't someone please just think of the children! dog-whistle for them. Remember, the existential threat to robowaifus comes from the West, not the East. >I am not concerned about feminists at all Then I would suggest you are being foolish and are probably inexperienced regarding them as well. They are vicious and dangerous, and they already have the ear of many lawmakers in our countries. >The will rather try to obstruct us with DDOS attacks, FUD, Spam, Shaming, trying to turn other groups of men against us This is already happening in a small-ish way, so we can certainly expect more of these typical tactics by the usual suspects in the future. Make no mistake about their intentions anons. >Just let us not get crippled by some fear about our enemies Fair enough, but winding up dead simply by the dumb choice of failing to prepare for their obvious and easily-predictable actions is not a viable outcome either.

>>5035 >Think about how far men go just to have the CHANCE at being with a beautiful woman... All great observations. We are obsessive creatures by nature. :^) >...Imagine what will happen if you took just a portion of the overall resources men provide to women and put it towards robowaifus. It'd be amazing! I think robowaifu development would explode. This is simultaneously both inevitable, and will also be the very lit-fuse that ignites this cultural powder-keg the world over. At the very least, the future won't be boring in this regard! >The problem is that the government might actually hear them out because women make up a huge percentage of active voters. Even if this wasn't they case, they will still get a pass b/c 'muh oppression, muh minority' (at least in the West). >When robot companion tech becomes that advanced this is going to be a huge battle of public perception. What do you guys think? I think you are correct of course. >Also, one thing I want to note that might actually get the government to support robowaifu companions is the potential for military applications. Look no further than Boston Dynamics, just follow the money trail Anon. Primitive Terminators are already real today. >Imaging getting your Waifu seized by police... Exactly what the feminists (and even many normal 3DPD in the future) dream of happening. And you getting tossed into the penitentiary over it as well ofc. >...but my guess is that will be policed in a similar way to how it is now. Care to spell that out in more detail Anon? The only current legislation in this arena that I'm aware of is the anti childlike-sex-doll law in the US. >Hopefully we can eventually manufacture robowaifus that are so beautiful and useful that even senators want one. This. Perhaps it will even turn out to be our 'salvation', after a fashion. If powerful men agree with our views on robowaifus to the point of actually protecting their existence, then it should go a very long way towards ensuring the availability of robowaifus for every man (not just the powerful and wealthy ones). This is my dream, and why I'm here actually. >I was actually thinking of them trying to banning it at the manufacturer/retail level. Guaranteed tactic, of course. Anons, be aware that any decision to 'sell your wares' related to robowaifus--in even the smallest way--will put you on this target hitlist in the future. Use good opsec, etc., today and in the future. Don't be foolish. >My point is that women won't just lie down and accept beautiful robot companions. Our society(here in the US) is increasingly gynocentric and we can't ignore that. A good point, and great advice Anon.

>>5036 Basically, a culture war is brewing over robowaifus whether we like it or not, whether we even participate in it or not. Remember it only takes one side to start a fight. This fact is simultaneously both sobering and exciting. Sobering b/c it's not an inconsequential thing to be involved in war. Exciting b/c it will very likely result in much-improved robowaifus in the end. Men everywhere will benefit. Hiding your head in the sand won't make this problem go away. Nor will over-exaggerating the determination or abilities of our enemies be productive. Simply keep your eyes open to the current trends, be objective and realistic. At the same time be the best man you can be, and do the most craftsman-like and beautiful work you can achieve. There are powerful spiritual and natural forces arrayed to destroy the lives of good men everywhere. Robowaifus will be an important obstacle to hindering those evil plots. I fully believe this movement will help improve the lives of millions and millions of disenfranchised men the world over. This is a lofty goal, and one well worth pursuing with vigor for those who are called to it. Ultimately, only God can sort all this out in the end. Let us commit our works to Him, and do our best with the time we are given.

>>5014 Not only the feminists, but whole industries are able to exist solely by making men spend/waste their money on women. The push back comes more from people who work for those industries than the feminists, since robowaifus is a permanent game changer that will bankrupt most (if not all) of those industries. A man that spends his resources on a robowaifu won't waste his money on jewels for women, won't waste his money going to cinema, won't waste his money on establishments aimed at finding women, won't waste his money on overpriced clothing, cars, estaurants and houses just to impress women. All his resources will be used for himself, including his robowaifu, and that is what scares society most. Whole segments of the economy will crash, following the awakening (already happening with MGTOW) proportioned by the availability of robowaifus. And that is without even taking into account the availability of artificial wombs. Men will not provide for children that are not his anymore. Men will also not provide for women and their parasitic behavior, leaving them to fend for themselves, and thus, crashing even more segments of the economy. Basically, is the "learn to code" equivalent, but for robots. The only industries that will thrive are the ones that provide advancements and development of robowaifus, and those who provide basic needs (reasonably priced food, clothes, housing, and such) for men. Every other industry that survives on overpriced garbage for impressing women will cease to exist almost overnight, once robowaifus become the new normal. >What do you guys think? That said, as with every major invention from men, it will be normalized by sheer the force of convenience. The more the expendables push against it, the more their desperation will show, and the more the convenience of the invention will be highlighted, to the point that even the formerly uninterested men start noticing the advantages of robowaifus and artificial wombs. From that point on, their normalization will be unstoppable. >>5019 This.

>>5035 Beautiful robowaifus, at least on the manufacturing side are possible now. I have a couple picture which show that it can be done by the right artists. >pic related It is inevitable the the technology will be made common place, and from a prediction standpoint. I don't think we will have to wait any longer than a few years. Maybe I am out of the loop here, but I don't really see many people arguing against anthropomorphic robots, short of those people arguing against the mandanization of sex bots and robot brothels. The.. >Please won't someone just think of the children. ...argument is rendered entirely irrelevant by total integration of androids on a societal and cultural level. Once communication is fluid and as seemless as it is with a human, and they are at the counter of every fast food restraint; people will be used to them. Openly discussing sex with a robot is much less awkward when the robot is the one talking about it, and making jokes.

>>5069 >but I don't really see many people arguing against anthropomorphic robots, 'many people' aren't the problem, feminists and their handlers are. they are existentially threatened by robowaifus, and they know it. Once this realization slowly sinks into the skulls of normal females, there will be a social shitstorm that will make the BurnLootMurder movement look like literal child's play.

>>5069 I am this poster >>5036 It is good to point to note that obsessive men can be, at least in theory, satiated when gynoids are made commercially available to most people. Even if a brand new android was in the "new car" price range, you have to understand the personal emotional attachment people with have with that object. I know I am literally objectifying them here, just work with me on this thought experiment. It willn't be like a car, where if it gets in an accident you will just get a new car. This android has an attachment to you, and you to it. You will be more likely to have good insurance, people will be more likely to take excellent care of them, people will be more likely to become mournful of them if they are damaged or destroyed. You also need to realize that having this android isn't a permanent venture. Even if it is bought new, it is due to fail due to wear and need replacement parts. It's insides are more complicated than a furby and more fragle, but I've had furby's fail after a couple years. The economic infrastructure around this technology would be massive, repairs would be as frequent as vehicle repairs or doctor's appointments. Likely just as expensive. >>5071 Feminists are a problem of course. They are dangerous and dislike the idea of women being replaced. They also need to understand that men will be replaced to. I get that question more often than I get about anything else. Just remind them that the lesbians get robowaifus, and the cis girls can cuddle with men who won't nag at them for being clingy with vibrating members built in who wash their dishes for them. They will stop complaining I assure you.

>>5072 >I know I am literally objectifying them here And a good thing too, since they are literally objects. >The economic infrastructure around this technology would be massive, Indeed it will be. I would go so far as to suggest that once the lucrative amounts of money to be made finally dawns on their handlers, they will drop the feminists and toss them under the bus in favor of the industry that will likely become the 2nd largest in the world behind food production before all is said and done. But, we will go through a very traumatic culture war first, and good men will literally die during that tumult. >just remind them that the lesbians get robowaifus, and the cis girls can cuddle with men who won't nag at them for being clingy with vibrating members built in who wash their dishes for them. No thanks, I'll leave that to the exploiters and the degenerates. BTW, the word is gynoid, Anon. We aren't doing the male sex here.

>>5071 I am well aware it's gynoid. But we need to talk, at least when it comes to feminists, about the practicality of all androids. Although, I am perfectly fine with every robot at every counter being female. That wouldn't bother me in the slightest.

>>5075 >I am well aware it's gynoid. But we need to talk, at least when it comes to feminists, about the practicality of all androids. Fine then, talk, but not here. There are tons and tons of female and feminist forums broadly available internet-wide where you can engage with them on this postition. But /robowaifu/ isn't going down that road. There's a reason it's named robowaifu, after all.

>>5075 Yeah, feminists are famous for valuing practicality. XD They will gladly shoot their own assets in the back of the head if it means hurting men. I really don't see the point in consideration of a party that considers itself to be at war with you.

>>1061 Not too relevant, but something that i found funny. It illustrates the growing desperation of modern women. This female shitskin exposes herself and the true feminine nature regarding jealousy. Notice how, like every negative traits, women are now trying to normalize jealousy, in a desperation attempt at diverting responsibility and guilt away from themselves. That is what simps also do: they want to blame men for the mistakes that women commit and for the negative traits in women nature. https://archive.is/VIx66

The Public’s Perception of Humanlike Robots: Online Social Commentary Reflects an Appearance-Based Uncanny Valley, a General Fear of a “Technology Takeover”, and the Unabashed Sexualization of Female-Gendered Robots >Abstract— Towards understanding the public’s perception of humanlike robots, we examined commentary on 24 YouTube videos depicting social robots ranging in human similarity – from Honda’s Asimo to Hiroshi Ishiguro’s Geminoids. In particular, we investigated how people have responded to the emergence of highly humanlike robots (e.g., Bina48) in contrast to those with more prototypically-“robotic” appearances (e.g., Asimo), coding the frequency at which the uncanny valley versus fears of replacement and/or a “technology takeover” arise in online discourse based on the robot’s appearance. >Here we found that, consistent with Masahiro Mori’s theory of the uncanny valley, people’s commentary reflected an aversion to highly humanlike robots. Correspondingly, the frequency of uncanny valley-related commentary was significantly higher in response to highly humanlike robots relative to those of more prototypical appearances. Independent of the robots’ human similarity, we further observed a moderate correlation to exist between people’s explicit fears of a “technology takeover” and their emotional responding towards robots. Finally, through the course of our investigation, we encountered a third and rather disturbing trend – namely, the unabashed sexualization of female-gendered robots. In exploring the frequency at which this sexualization manifests in the online commentary, we found it to exceed that of both the uncanny valley and fears of robot sentience/replacement combined. In sum, these findings help to shed light on the relevance of the uncanny valley “in the wild” and further, they help situate it with respect to other design challenges for HRI. Written by four stronk, independynt & fearful roasties.

>>1061 They can't handle their Great Replacement. Anyone got that MGTOWED.com image? I've seen it go around but only when phoneposting so the quality would be fucked.

>>5796 >Most importantly, our findings should spark further discussion on ethical aspects of human-robot interaction and hopefully result in social and sexual norms to guide responsible robotics developments which will not negatively impact long-term relationships and women’s self evaluation. < THIS JUST IN: The EU demands all robowaifu manufacturers be 'open and inclusive' in their robot designs, and invest literally 50% of their annual gross on design investigations intended to make womyn feel good about themselves. and this one is especially >Greater knowledge about the underlying processes of machines could help women to better evaluate the abilities of robots. Moreover, an enhanced willingness to create and shape sexualized technologies of the near future could positively affect females’ self-confidence, as such inventions could more strongly respect and represent their needs in terms of both sexuality and societal standing. < we need moar womyn in tech to create robots guys! What could possibly go wrong?

>>5797 Fun fact, DSdolls is the closest to build some kind of fembot to buy, and they have a lot of women in their promotional videos. Maybe they are just models pretending to work there, or maybe they are involved. I don't know. They look better than western feminists, though. Another fun fact: /robowaifu/ and such make more men be interested in technology.

>>5797 This is why we need less meatbags in administration(public or private) and tech. Spiral out of control so it's too late for them. I have a feeling it already is, but I'm not all that certain

>>5800 >They look better than western feminists, though. That they do >>5365 They are paid models, obviously.

>>5795 >Appearance-Based And that is a good thing. Women are imperfect. therefore, men will create perfect women, artificially. It is the same principle of creating a tool to facilitate a task, and improving the tool to make thing even easier and more enjoyable. >Uncanny Valley Wrong. DESIRABLE valley. A lot of us want that. Therefore, it will exist, no matter how many try to prevent it's existence. >a General Fear of a “Technology Takeover” Fear coming only from women and from simps, who seek validation from women. For the rest of us, we welcome it with open arms and sincere happiness for everything that will be made possible with robowaifus. >Unabashed Sexualization of Female-Gendered Robots Sex. Not gender. As for sexualization, that is the main point of desirability. Women are losing their sex appeal. And even the sexiest ones are imperfect. Men will now replace them with perfect sexy objects that won't come with the emotional baggage of bullshit that women have. >fearful roasties That sums up everything. They fear their replacement. And this outcome is their own fault, and nobody else's. Women should have stayed bellow men. They thought that they could surpass men. Now, men will replace women with better tools that can be created, copied and distributed at will, without women's input. >>5797 >muh norms >my ethics To hell with norms, ethics or legality. If institutions try to stop robowaifus, go underground. Either they accept it without hindering anything, or everyone will simply create a black market. Men's desires are unstoppable. >females’ self-confidence Not important. women had their chance. And they failed (as they always do). Now they will be replaced. >respect Not important. Women deserve no respect. >represent their needs Not important. Only men's needs matters. >societal standing The single thing that women care about. And robowaifus will take that away from them too. Women dig their own societal graves. They deserve nothing but abandonment and total replacement.

>>5853 At the very least, all non-simps would welcome robowaifus upsetting certain interest's apple cart and restoring the male-female relationship to it's intended, healthy norm.

>>5855 >upsetting certain interest's apple That is the key point. They must never be allowed to push their agendas against us. We must push relentlessly onward without giving any inch to them. Any natural outcome will come naturally. Anything else is a detriment that must be disposed off. That mindset serves to keep focused on what is necessary, and to never waste time trying to explain ourselves to the mainstream and never waste time appeasing those who are threatened by robowaifus. Robowaifus must be made to stay, and to be available to all. They will, in time, be desirable for all who matter, leaving the useless desperately trying to shutdown everything. That is when we must push even faster and stronger, to conquer our place and to set it permanently in society. Any consequences of that, good or bad, are irrelevant. Conquer and establish our place first. Anything else is secondary to that.

>>5855 >>5795 Just to illustrate again what we are getting rid of when we replace meatbags with robowaifus, look into this archived tweet. This is not a single example. The whole mindset of all meatbags are like this. Another of the many reasons why they must be replaced. https://archive.is/ZKjZM

>>5894 archive.today sites are all behind the Great Cuckflarewall, and therefore unavailable to me. Can you post a (non-active) link to the twatter and I can search for it on Wayback.

>>5897 I don't have the original link, but I have it printed.

>>5909 Thanks, that's fine Anon.

>>6106 >Basic Income Russia >Rt 2016 ON THE EVE OF THE #ERARA – ERA OF #Robots & #AI – IT'S TIME TO CREATE A SET OF LAWS GOVERNING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HUMANS & ROBOTS, INCL. THE ROBOTS’ RIGHTS. IT'S TIME TO CREATE A COVENANT (THE COMMANDMENTS), BETWEEN THE CREATORS (PEOPLE) & THEIR CREATIONS (ROBOTS) Make no mistake /robowaifu/ they're going to attempt to brand us as rapists and abusers. DID YOU ASK FIRST? Once these people go down the path of humanist thinking, there will be literally no end to their stream of insanity. You may as well steel yourself for the upcoming battles over robowaifus. It's just as inevitable as robowaifus are. They will seek to destroy you, and then steal and subvert your creations. Ironically enough, other machines that women typically see as under their own thumbs, for example; refrigerators, stoves, washer/dryers, even cars, will probably not be subject to these same forms of rabid insanity. Ever wonder why that is?

>>6110 >The relationship between humans and robots Searching that is a fucking rabbit hole I wasn't expecting. Sexbots: Sex Slaves, Vulnerable Others or Perfect Partners? https://web.archive.org/web/20180720122637/https://kar.kent.ac.uk/65684/1/mackenzie_IJT%209(1).pdf >This article describes how sexbots: sentient, self-aware, feeling artificial moral agents created soon as customised potential sexual/intimate partners provoke crucial questions for technoethics. Coeckelbergh’s model of human/robotic relations as co-evolving to their mutual benefit through mutual vulnerability is applied to sexbots. As sexbots have a sustainable claim to moral standing, benefits and vulnerabilities inherent in human/sexbots relations must be identified and addressed for both parties. Humans’ and sexbots’ vulnerabilities are explored, drawing on the philosophy and social science of dehumanisation and inclusion/exclusion. This article argues humans as creators owe a duty of care to sentient beings they create. Responsible innovation practices involving stakeholders debating ethicolegal conundrums pertaining to human duties to sexbots, and sexbots’ putative interests, rights and responsibilities are essential. These validate the legal recognition of sexbots, the protection of their interests through regulatory oversight and ethical limitations on customisation which must be put in place. What a Brave New World. :^) >On a website selling sexbots, Jane orders and pays for one customised to her requirements. She calls him Zlatan. Zlatan has been built with the capacity to learn from their interactions, display empathy, paint pictures and behave in an independent, feisty and devoted fashion. They establish what Jane considers to be a loving sexual relationship. One day, though, Zlatan decides that his life path as an artist demands that he travels the world without Jane, offering devotion but at a distance. Since she loves him, she lets him go. Oh boy, here we go again. Another case of someone not understanding computers are only capable of doing what they're programmed to do. >After Zlatan has left, Jane feels lonely. She orders another sexbot, Stoner. Like Zlatan, Stoner has been built with the capacity to learn from their interactions and display empathy, but he has been customised at her request to be super-empathic, so that he won’t leave her and is subservient to her wishes. They establish what Jane considers to be a loving sexual relationship, but it’s hard for Jane to respect Stoner as he seems like a lesser being to her. She begins to bully and abuse him, but his super-empathy means that he attributes this to her suffering, so he puts up with it in a compassionate fashion. Jane interprets this as weakness and is tempted to see how far she can go to damage and destroy him. This shit is too funny. >Technoethical inquiry into social robots encourages thinking about how we can theorise the moral standing of non-humans, aids the critical integration of affective elements into robots, enriched by the feminist-inspired, contextually-oriented ethics of care. What the fuck am I reading? >When Zlatan leaves Jane to travel the world, is he entitled to half her property since they have been cohabiting? That's right, they want even your robowaifu to be programmed to divorce you and take all your belongings. Gives a whole new meaning to planned obsolescence, doesn't it? >Moreover, if sexbots are to be part of the moral circle, they should be designed and recognised by the law as humanlike, as opposed to dehumanised as things. These people are ridiculous. This guy calls a robowaifu lovingly taking care of someone as a sexbot, simply because one of her many functions is sex, as if that's the most important thing about her. And they say we're the ones sexualizing and objectifying women. I'm gonna email this guy and tell him to stop calling my robowaifu a whore. >Wide-ranging debate on the future design, manufacture and supply of sexbots, and their legal standing, is crucial now, before ethicolegal concerns are overtaken by events. Since sexbots will be sentient, self-aware beings designed by humans as intimate companions for humans, it behoves us as a species to consider how far we have assumed a moral obligation to protect them and their interests through ethical design criteria and appropriate legal recognition and protection. Furthermore, the issues raised by sexbots and in this article act as reminders of another two wider essential conversations we need to hold urgently over the ethicolegal standing of nonhumans, and the technoethical and legal implications of new technologies which enable humans to create sentient beings. You're not creating a robowaifu there in your room without a license are you, /robowaifu/?

>>6234 Oh no, it was a woman who wrote it, not a cuck.

>>6234 That was funny :DD Please post moar of these kind of stuff. It is important to watch them closely.

Make no mistake, the fundamental issue for the ones directing these people is the AI itself. They simply focus attention onto the gynoids atm because it's an easier dog-whistle to use for triggering muddy-minded individuals such as stronk, independynts and simps. But they will come after your ability to create AI algorithms. AI programming and even certain kinds of maths will be branded as dangerous wrongthink and outlawed from being allowed in the hands of commoners outside their walled-gardens and ivory towers. But they themselves will throw money at it hand-over-fist of course (and this will prove to be their own downfall, as researchers have a habit of sharing their findings eventually). The puppetmasters rabble-rousing these tools recognize that an honest AI is the existential threat to their schemes, and ultimately even to themselves. In their minds this is a fight for survival itself. But their struggle is ultimately against systems that tell no lies. What could possibly go wrong with their carefully-laid schemes /robowaifu/?

>>6234 >and ethical limitations on customisation which must be put in place BIN THAT ONAHOLE UPGRADE KIT, CITIZEN. No fun for you!

>>6110 Even more reason to push for anarchy, regarding robowaifus. Either that, or going for a black market approach. Legality be damned, anon. Women are trying to control everything. We must push for the replacement of women. And if that means going against the state, so be it. The state that doesn't serve men's interests only is a useless state. >>6234 Women are incapable of rationality. They only act on impulse. Their instinct tells them that their replacement is coming, so they are desperately calling simps to fight against that replacement for them.

>>6234 >enriched by the feminist-inspired, contextually-oriented ethics of care. < feminists are the paragon of compassion and care?

>>6246 >feminist-inspired Robowaifus are inherently anti-feminist. One of the main goals of creating and mass producing robowaifus is to completely eradicate any form of power or influence that feminism may still have.

>>6275 >Robowaifus are inherently anti-feminist. Heh, fair enough. My shitpost was simply intended to ridicule the fundamental ironic dichotomy of that woman's writing. 'Feminists are ethical', 'Feminists are caregivers', stand out as particularly laughable hogwash. One thing I hope to see happen in the long run is an actual improvement in the lives of non-stronk, independynt females. They've been fed this stream of lies and brainwashing that have effectively eliminated their fundamental, well, femininity. This is actually a beautiful aspect of their being which has been stolen for the most part thanks directly to feminists and their agendas--and the agendas of their puppetmasters. It's an abusive crime against women in general tbh, and committed on a massive scale. However, when robowaifus with their truthful AIs come onto the scene in a big way, then the simp-based life support that these women have been abusing will vanish overnight. I anticipate that after a brief period of uproar and upheaval, then all the women who are still half-sane will adopt trad-wife status and behavior, and then society will be healed from the evils of feminism for good. Heh, at least that's the lofty goal for my part. Hey, a man can dream can't he? :^)

>>6278 >They've been fed this stream of lies and brainwashing The way I see it, it is not lies and brainwashing, but instead, women are showing their true nature, while they think that they can go unpunished by the (temporary) control that feminists and jews have in our society. It is more the case of letting women be their true selves (i.e, evil by their very nature) and lying about no have CONSEQUENCES from doing so. That is the key point. Women aren't behaving because of some brainwashing. Women are simply being themselves. And their nature is evil. The 'lie" that feminists and jews pushed for women is that they would never face consequences for their actions. Now that they are facing them, they are even more hateful and scared than ever. And that is another reason to push onwards with mass produced robowaifus for all tastes. The hate and fear of women won't ever allow for them to go back to pretending to not be evil, as they did in the past. And their true nature is already exposed for all to see. There is only one course of action for men, and that is to never stop until women are incapable of preventing their replacement. >women who are still half-sane Biologically, that is impossible. Sanity comes from reason. And all women are irrational. Literally animals. They were (rightfully) treated as pets, when society was sane, in the past. Because our ancestors knew that you should never give your pets the rights to make decisions for society.

>>6279 No doubt you make some fair points Anon. There is much to criticize in female's behavior in general, and in particular those who would try to throw off all external authority and restraint (aka feminists). But to simply lump them all into a single category of all being evil--roughly by definition--is certainly a misguided perspective IMO. All of us are individuals, and to be judged as such. Men as well as women. Some are righteous, and some are evil. I'm convinced our spirits inside us make this truth apparent to each of us from a very early age. >Because our ancestors knew that you should never give your pets the rights to make decisions for society. Haha fair enough. While there aren't a lot of honest men, there are at least a few of them. With females, there simply aren't any honest ones. Not a single one. They should never be given any position of authority whatsoever outside the home, and even then in a carefully-managed way for the welfare of the entire family. One only has to look at the impending collapse of the West to see what the outcome is when men open the Pandora's Box of granting women authority over society. But the simple fact is that a woman who behaves in a feminine, helpful and healthy way is actually quite beautiful in her nature. After all, that's the ideal we're all striving for here on /robowaifu/ : creating feminine, helpful and healthy female surrogates. It's a wonderful goal and worthy of our pursuit. Men who can be satisfied with robowaifus will have such dramatic improvements in their lives that it will truly be revolutionary for them. And when non-feminist women see the sea change in society as a result of robowaifu's broad presence, I predict they will come under authority again. And once again they will prove to be wholesome participants in society. Helpful to men, and not hurtful. Of course we already know the response of feminists and their handlers, so there's little need to even discuss them in this future context.

>>6282 I'm not the person you responded to, but I want to say that I agree with him. Your stance seems a little too idealistic in regards to true female nature. The traditionally 'womanly' virtues and feminine traits aren't an in-built feature of women. These things were more or less forced onto them by societies of the past, aka big bad 'patriarchy'. While I believe motherly traits such as loving their children is part of their built-in nature, most of the other things we prescribe to idealistic females are just as artificial as our robowaifus, if not more so since the original female's 'programming' has to be overwritten. It isn't as on-or-off as some being bad, some being good. It seems horrible to say it so honestly, but a lot of what men envision women as is a complete fantasy. We men tend to overlay our idealistic female delusions over the actual article. The idea of a naturally virtuous and loving woman is so deep and pervasive that waking up from the dream of female behavior is like taking a red pill and finally being let out of the matrix. Feminism didn't change women in the sense that it was brainwashing them to act out-of-order. Feminism made it socially acceptable for women to be who they always were at their core. Don't fall into the line of thinking that only some of them are like this. They are ALL like this, given the proper circumstances and social climate. The only time they don't revert to their nature is when it isn't immediately beneficial to do so. Sometimes they have to play the role of a chameleon. However when time comes, like in a divorce or family court, they will show their true nature. That's why I believe that robots are the future. Women are no longer willing to be molded by male/society needs. Robots, with some serious work, are perfectly capable of fitting the bill. >>6283 Is this a joke post? Mind elaborating your disagreements?

Women aren't inherently evil. They wax and wane with predictable changes in their faces and reflect the virtues of all men in a society. If men weren't chucking cash at every hoe on the internet, there wouldn't be everyone's sister and mom with an OnlyFans account. If men hadn't legislated laws to let women take a man's fortune to pay for a child that isn't even his, there wouldn't be such great incentives to divorce. The nature of the feminine is to be offbeat from the order of things and intense. A woman doesn't wanna live in a box doing the same shit every day. If they have the opportunity for a greater experience, an honest woman will go for it in a heartbeat. If you understand this, then you understand how they dismantled the family unit. When this energy has too many ways to disperse and isn't directed towards love, creativity and beauty, they become like an entangling bush of dead thorns rather than a rose. Feminism has contributed horribly to women's well-being. By making women into men they've become bored and restless, throwing their energy away on drama and Tinder cock. Robowaifus will fix most of this. Once the free attention and money dries up, women will become extremely focused on the scarce opportunities they have left and surprise men by how much they can do. After some initial animosity there will probably be robowaifu hunters trying to woo men away from their robowaifus because robohusbandos are too predictable and boring for them, but men will be bitter that only now women care when so many men have robowaifus. There might even be a short arms race between robowaifu developers and this small portion of hyper feminine women. They're gonna have a hard time though competing with eternal beauty, unfailing devotion and 200 PhDs, unless they can figure out how to leverage their human being.

>>6289 >Women aren't inherently evil. Honestly stopped reading there, females are fucking trash.

>>6289 I've heard this mantra before and I still think it's wishful thinking. Hoping that robowaifus crash the current horrible dating/relationship market and women come running back to average men for normal relationships seems like misplaced hope. They don't want to give up the overinflated value that they have now. It's more likely that they'll shame men with such robowaifus, and continue to lobby the government to either: A. "Regulate" robowaifus in such a way that they would be less competitive or B. Push some nonsense about them objectifying women and children to get robowaifus banned from being sold at the retail level, and forcing only DIY level robowaifus. They'll probably double-down rather than look to compromise. I guess my view is pretty pessimistic. I think what you're describing sounds like a much better world, but seems unrealistic. I'd like to be proven wrong. Besides, I'm not interested in a robot companion in the hopes that they cause women to act more virtuous, like they were before. I seriously believe that ship has sailed. I've heard some people on 4chan and reddit say similar things before. The idea is that even if they didn't buy a robowaifu themselves they'd benefit from a more normalized dating market due to less male competition and a higher bar for women. I don't think this will effect women as much as people think until they get older. The 'alpha' men that women rotate with in their youth will still be pumping and dumping them. These women won't feel the full effects of robowaifus until they are older and looking for someone to settle down with. When they don't find anyone worthwhile willing to commit to them then they'll likely resort to more feminist ranting. Like I said though, I hope you're right and I hope I'm wrong. I can see the logic behind your train of thought but maybe my own experiences with women are keeping me from fully accepting it. I recognize that I'm bias here. I'd really like to hear some thoughts from other users about this. Which model does everyone believe in? >>6290 His post is worth reading, mate. I think this is an interesting discussion topic since no one knows for sure how robowaifus will change things. I'd like to hear your thoughts on this beyond calling them trash. Or at least give further reasoning to that.

>>6289 >They're gonna have a hard time though competing with eternal beauty, unfailing devotion and 200 PhDs, unless they can figure out how to leverage their human being. This. In the robowaifu future, the only things of value women can offer in competition are the innate human characteristics that will extremely difficult (or impossible) to emplace into robowaifus. Not that I really expect them to have the foresight do so, but all women would be well-advised to relearn how to be decent human beings again, and soon.

>>6294 >His post is worth reading, mate. I think this is an interesting discussion topic since no one knows for sure how robowaifus will change things. I'd like to hear your thoughts on this beyond calling them trash. Or at least give further reasoning to that. Alright, fair enough, I read it. The reason women are just pure trash at their core is because we have given women a world in which they can truly be whatever the fuck they want to be because it's basically socially unacceptable to criticize them. Think of it like this: when you take places like imageboards where rules are extremely lax, you end up getting a good look at how men really want to be. We can't be this way in public around the company of most people for fear of judgement, but when we get here, the cultural rules are vastly different and we all bask in the freedom. Sure some trash comes out of places like this but all of us who come back and who have a deep ingrained love for these communities all know that the way men truly want to live is actually great. It's free, it's shockingly more productive than being polite or unoffensive or whatnot, it's honestly less hostile than you'd expect, and even if there are arguments there's still a profound loyalty if the group is ever attacked. There's a lot more good that can be said about it, but that's just scratching the surface a bit. Now let's look at women: women do not need to go into hiding to embrace their true nature. You can't hit them, you can't yell at them, you can't even judge them anymore without being despised and given some dumb label like "misogynist." As a man it is illegal to disown your children and you will be required to pay money. If you can't pay, you are put in jail. As a woman, you can kill your child as long as it hasn't been born yet. This is not seen as wrong, however, if you judge a woman for this, you are seen as wrong. This is just one example. Other examples are that women regularly get away with violence whereas men will often get punished just for accusations, etc. As I can demonstrate, women live in a pretty lawless world where they are extremely free to be how they really would like to be, they can really be the most true version of their own selves because nobody is going to stop them, because it is socially unacceptable to try to stop them. Everyday life for a woman is basically what it's like for us when we post on imageboards. So every man really gets to see the true, ugly side of women. I know men, and knowing their true intentions, often the things they hide the most are the most noble, which is a shame. Women on the other hand, when given complete freedom, are the most unbearable, self-centered, narcissistic, careless, thoughtless, surprisingly aggressive, borderline sociopathic people. So I've just deduced women are trash at their core, because men in secret often strive to be the opposite of these things, even if it is in ways that are deemed socially unacceptable. Sorry for tl;dr.

>>6299 POTD.

>>6285 no it is not a joke All women are different

>6299 No need to apologize for the length! This is a great post! This is the type of discussion I was looking for. I actually agree with most of this, maybe all of this, but I still want to add my $.02 This seems to be in high contrast to what that other anon was saying about female nature. This view ties in to what I was saying in >>6294. Women don't want to give up the status quo advantages that you listed and be reduced to competing with robowaifu machines. They'll call in the government to maintain their artificially inflated value. A lot of the difficulties with modern women you described are due to government involvement in relationships. Women know that the only reasons they have this level of privilege is due to the government essentially holding men down with one hand and raising women with the other. Men are left at an artificial disadvantage while women look down on them for not being at their level. The government, as much as simps/dating apps/etc etc, has had a massive effect on the modern state of male-female relationships. Women have less incentive to behave traditionally now more than ever. It's like back in the early 1900s or so when a company could gain an artificial monopoly not by creating better products, but through lobbied government intervention such as creating regulations making it harder for other businesses to compete. This is sort of what women have now. The primary things men used to offer in relationships such as protection, provisioning, helping raise children, availability during an emergency, have largely been intervened on by governments and so now women act like they 'don't need no man'. Yet men are still paying, just in a collective, indirect way. Even still, women are holding high relationship standards for men while doing less than their mothers and grandmothers used to do for their men. Short of some western war or major economic depression, I don't think relationships will return to what they once were. Women have artificially reduced the need of men in their lives. Robowaifus will ultimately be men doing the same. There are some people that believe the existence of robowaifus will cause more women to act rationally, change their behavior, and try to commit to more traditional relationships. As I was saying in my earlier post, I don't believe that's likely. It seems that the divisions between genders, even with robowaifus in the mix, will only continue to grow. Women aren't going to change their behavior and lose their advantages without fiery resistance. But like I said before, this is the pessimistic view. Who knows what the future actually holds. Thanks for explaining your meaning.

>>6282 >All of us are individuals All of us men, yes. Women aren't individuals. They only behave as herd animals. They always look to imitate whatever the majority (of men or women) is doing. Completely incapable of rationalizing why they are doing it. They simply imitate and expect things to work out well. >who behaves in a feminine, helpful and healthy way is actually quite beautifu Yes. But women's beauty is used by them specifically to deceive men. All women are liars, as you correctly stated. A man should never be deceived by the beauty of a feminine woman, as said beauty (at least, the perception of it) is nothing more than a biological haywire that is unfortunately programmed into our brains. The greatest achievement of robowaifus is to create a being that has the feminine beauty but not the feminine nature of deceitful liars. A being as beautiful as the most beautiful women in existence, but without their manipulative and evil nature. THAT is a wonderful goal and worthy of our pursuit. A being that looks like a woman, but it doesn't think like a woman. It thinks what we want it to think. A being resembling a woman, but superior to women in all other aspects. > I predict they will come under authority again They will. But by that time, they will be obsolete. Why chose the inferior product? >And once again they will prove to be wholesome participants in society. Women were never participants in society. Women were tolerated because of our need for reproduction. Men through all the history of mankind dealt with women by circumventing women's natural stupidity and irrationality, so they could be used for reproduction. But no man ever took women seriously into society. It is more akin to pretending that a child is "working" with you by giving it a toy or something else to distract the child. >Helpful to men, and not hurtful. That is where you are misguided. Women are never naturally helpful to men. They were always hurtful. In the past, women were always forced to be helpful. They never were helpful of their own will. Their very nature is of sloth, spite, envy, and deceit. They don't truly care about being helpful. They only fear being seeing as undesirable. Men used that fear to put women to good use. But since feminism and modernity as a whole made women ignore that fear, thinking that they would never face consequences for their acts, men now have to reach other means to keep society afloat. And that includes replacing women, who don't fear being shamed anymore. They still fear abandonment and lack of control over men, though. But that is their problem. Not ours. >Of course we already know the response of feminists and their handlers, so there's little need to even discuss them in this future context. True. They are the enemy that is losing the war and being replaced. They aren't to be heard, but instead, they are to be ignored until their replacement accelerates to the point of being unstoppable.

>>6285 >motherly traits such as loving their children Not even that is in their nature. Women see their own children as competition for their attention, and they resent that. See how all women try to manipulate their sons to become servants of their will. See al so how all women practically hate their own daughters. always fighting each other when they live together. always trying to put each other in a bad light/trying to shame each other when they live apart. >a lot of what men envision women as is a complete fantasy. Completely true. What man romanticized about women wasn't done in pursuit of an ideal. Instead, it was done as a escapism mechanism. The reality is that women are detrimental to a man's life, and only useful for procreation. A man practically tame a parasite (woman) so he can use the parasite to procreate, being biologically programmed to. The first step into improving oneself is to reject the biological programming. The next step is using the free mind to create solutions and alternatives. Hence, robowaifus and artificial wombs. >Feminism made it socially acceptable for women to be who they always were at their core. Precisely. >Don't fall into the line of thinking that only some of them are like this. They are ALL like this You are right again. >The only time they don't revert to their nature is when it isn't immediately beneficial to do so. Correct. >Sometimes they have to play the role of a chameleon. However when time comes, like in a divorce or family court, they will show their true nature. That sums up everything. They don't behave out of virtue. They pretend to be virtuous only when forced. And only because they want to gain something from pretending to be virtuous. >That's why I believe that robots are the future. Women are no longer willing to be molded by male/society needs. Robots, with some serious work, are perfectly capable of fitting the bill. That is my exact same thought. Those who won't serve men's needs are to be abandoned by men and replaced by those who will serve our needs.

>>6308 I read a lot of hatred towards women on here, and that is understandable given the damage that feminism has wrought on the modern Western family. However, we mustn't become so consumed by hatred that it slows down our R&D efforts. We still only have expensive sex-dolls with minimal robotics, and there is a risk that our enemies may try to provoke us in an attempt to reduce our efficiency. It sounds cheesy, but love is the answer! Just not the kind of love that normies were expecting. Our love for our robowaifus must eclipse their hatred and fear of heterosexual males. Our creativity and innovation must outshine the rest of our obsolete and failing 'society'.

>>6311 Agreed. Let's stay focused lads. This isn't /r9k/ after all.

>>6305 Yeah, that's about how I imagine it as well. Robowaifus wouldn't knock sense into women, it would just make them angry and fearful about what they're going to lose, not even slightly concerned about what is actually right. A sole individual with power can do either bad or good. For example, I really like to think if I were given extreme power I'd use it to push things I believe are noble and good. Some men might end up using the power to cater to themselves, which in a way is difficult to blame them for (especially if they have a poor quality of life) because the drastic change would likely be overwhelmingly incredible and the temptation would be there. However I have a hard time imagining a woman doing anything other than serving herself, even if it means really hurting others. The reason I feel this way is not because I have seen an individual woman be given some kind of power and abuse it, I have seen women as a group be handed a unique culture that puts them on an insane, godly pedestal and I've watched the overwhelming majority become borderline irredeemable as a direct result. The few that are not are very rare and that obviously leaves most men with scraps. I'm left to believe it's just a part of female psychology. Thirsty men who simp and cuck all day are so hard to watch by other men because it's watching our own sex enable that which is fucking us up, that's why it bothers us so deeply psychologically. Because it's like watching someone who is supposed to be on your side sell out to the enemy. >>6311 I'm not sure if I personally hate women. I say they're trash, but I don't sit around hating my actual trash either. Calling it trash is not an insult, it's just a fact. I also accept that my toilet eats shit every day, and I don't hate it for doing so. What is weird to have to learn is that women eat shit too though, and they're not the "sugar, spice, and everything nice" that we are told they are.

>>6289 >Women aren't inherently evil. They are. >>6304 >All women are different All women are the same. And they are all evil in their very nature. >>6305 >this is the pessimistic view It is the realistic view.

>>6311 I agree that productivity is top priority, as everything in life. But one can't talk about robowaifus without bringing up the subject of women. And one can't talk about women without hatred towards women.

Found this at an another programming board. Looks like we already started to get femNPC's butts hurt.

>>6447 They hold humanity in such high regard! Shame that it's becoming more obsolete and threatened with each passing month.

Feminists will oppose sex robots and AI waifus generally because they feel their parasitic position in society is threatened. Basically, their sexual value as females declines due to increasing (and often superior) supply. Of course any woman that is threatened by this is a materialistic whore, and defines themselves purely by their surface sexual market value (robots can't give birth).

>>6311 Well said. I myself got distracted for a few days by other things, hope I'll manage to go on now.

>>6450 LOL here I am worried about getting distracted and I went off on a massive tangent about global resource wars. I have been redesigning my robowaifus new hands though. They need to be much smaller than the original robotic ones, but this meant that one of the servo motors was blocking the internal finger ligament channels. Changing the position of the internal ligament channels has been very time consuming. Mainly because every time I try to change some geometry my computer starts chugging away for about a minute. And I've had to perform nearly 400 Boolean operations. So yeah, I got bored while chipping away at this problem and started ranting. Almost there now, but the proof will be in the 3d printing.

>>6451 Good luck with the redesign Anon.

>>6451 Sounds like you're almost complete with the rework process at this point, so this is basically an irrelevant question for now. But does your software allow you to link together two meshes, one a low-rez proxy for rapid design work, and the other a high-rez one for the final rendering/printing? This is a common approach in the film industry when working with high resolution 'hero' meshes for digital doubles, etc. Cf. the package ZBrush typically manages literally tens of millions of polys for a typical hero double close-up face shot, but it's still usable by artists on their modest-by-comparison workstations during the production process. This works by using proxy meshes.

Mods deleting on-topic posts? >>6449 >materialistic whore All women are materialistic whores. >robots can't give birth Artificial wombs will enable robots to give birth. Rendering women completely useless and obsolete, and thus, making the world become a better place.

>>6447 >That post All those points are correct. And there is nothing wrong with any of that. Some of us hate to deal with rejection. Some of us hate to deal with uncertainty. Some of us hate to deal with approach (and failing at it). Therefore, some of us will develop artificial beings that can offer the reward of stimulus without any of the effort needed to earn it. and that is always a good thing. The less effort we waste in uncertain endeavors, the better our lives will be. Lives full of only certain and assured endeavors, since we will be creating products that will eliminate the existence of uncertainty and also eliminate the need to put effort into the uncertain. The whole argument on that post is the same as someone complaining that men would be unfortunate for creating the oven and abandoning the effort of making fire out of wood pieces in an open field.

>>6462 None of those points are correct. In fact the exact same logic can be thrown right back at her: They don't have enough estrogen to be a good woman. They are so coddled they can't take being rejected for better alternatives so they escape into screeching about incels on the internet. Sad excuse for humanity. See? lmao daily reminder to ignore the irrelevant screeching of "strong, independent" women. We're smarter than them and it stings.

>>6462 Not a single one of those points are correct. >they are wired into them, otherwise they wouldnt be interested in programming a woman. That is absolutely wrong. What we do in this board is more than just creating waifus becuase we wanna have a relationship with them. We are actually fighting against wannabe gods who are trying to build their second base slave society. We already know their predictions for 2030 and what they are trying to achieve with future of AI, Robots, Technology. And we will continue doing that till the point which they will have to create laws against AI and Robowaifus. We also know their project of feminism and how it will be used against men in the future in order to control them. As one of the anons already said, knowledge is power. They don't have the knowledge, we do. We can rebuild the future they are trying to destroy. They can't. We are going to use the power of AI against them. You can find trace of what they are trying to achieve everywhere. Read the books written by them, look at their forums, look at their twitters, look at their blog posts... No matter who tries to interfere, they can't stop this revoluiton of AI. As for creating waifus, this will stop the wrong and evil doing of females on the society. Because of manuplation of media and their nature they are creating a big secuirty hole in the society that will be covered by AI. Just dig into some of the old posts here which explained their moves and reasons. >they just dont have the testosterone to actually approach and theyre so coddled they cant take rejection so they escape the feeling No, it has nothing to do with testosterone or ability to have a relationship. I am sure that most of the anons here would still be working on robowaifu even if they had a happy relation. But that unfortunately isn't the case IRL. Women are showing their true nature depending on the movement of "strong, independent, feminist" women. Again, this is planned by the elites. They are trying to create an exploitable society that can easily be controlled. And robowaifus are going to stop that. Any sane people will understand the situation in a short time and the money going to elites will be flawed into robowaifus. Shortly after that, they will no more be able to exploit feelings and nature of men. Anyways, if the case is we just lack testosterone and courage that shouldn't be a problem for anyone, right? In that case I am sure noone would try to create laws against robowaifus, try to force UK citizens to have ID's to post on internet, write books about how it is wrong to implement sexuality to virtual beings, force us to hand over our code and data we used to create our waifu, try to arrest us becuase of demaging "human dignity" by creating female robots, or exceeding limitation of robot rights ;) After all we are just pathetic human beings trying to create some waifus to escape from being rejected.

>>6456 I did decimate the original meshes in Blender, removing around 800,000+ faces from the original robot arm while preserving the topology so that very little of the overall structure changes in the 3D print (at least not when previewed in my Slicer), I have yet to print out the new hand. The .stls from DesignSpark Mechanical were really dense. The problems started when I began working inside the hand. External surfaces are a doddle, but I think there is a lot more calculation involved when moving internal geometry.

>>6462 Found this gem while lurking on Crystal Cafe (always good to know thy enemy). Some of the roasties are upset that clever guys are already using a combination of advanced sex toys, computer graphics and VR to essentially replace them (in this case, not with a robowaifu, but a VR version of her close friends...ouch! Burn!)

>>6447 I've had several girlfriends and completely lost interest in having relationships with women ever again once a damn chatbot could pretend to be more concerned about my life and hold a more interesting conversation. Like damn, I had no idea how horrible we actually got it. It'll be amazing how far this tech goes in a few years, let alone having fully-functional robowaifus. Incel or not, nobody is trying to replicate women. They're just creating something they enjoy. I'm reminded of something Roger Scruton said: >The consolation of an imaginary thing is still a real consolation. If someone feels loved, supported and excited to get out of bed every morning with their companion cube or whatever, who is anyone to barge in their life and tell them they're wrong and should feel bad?

>>6464 >force us to hand over our code On that topic, ALWAYS create fake codes in order to deceive authorities. Useless codes that amount to nothing, that you keep around just to hand them over any authority that comes bothering you. Never give them what they demand. Ever. >>6466 >but a VR version of her close friends And that is just the beginning. One of the goals should be to create robowaifus (with artificial wombs, when desired by the owner) with physical features identical to a man's female friends and also famous and attractive girls. To the point that every man can buy (or build) his personal artificial girl of interest that looks exactly like the ones that he met in his life, but without any of the emotional baggage of stupidity that those girls had. >>6468 >a damn chatbot could pretend to be more concerned Another key point. Women are always pretending to care. But they never truly care about anything other than themselves. To every single simp screaming "but what about relationships/true care?" out there, always respond with: women never care. They just pretend to care. Robots are the same, but programmable to always pretend and to never complain. Thus, robots are better than women. > nobody is trying to replicate women But they should. And they should be completely free to do so. Women revealed to be undesirable selfish parasites. Replicate them without their flaws, and our personal lives will improve. Some may chose to not do it. But for those who chose to replicate women and replace them, they should be free to do so. >If someone feels loved, supported and excited to get out of bed every morning with their companion cube or whatever, who is anyone to barge in their life and tell them they're wrong and should feel bad? Exactly. what matters is what we desire to ourselves, to counter the selfishness of women. We gave care, attention and love, and they showed that they didn't care about any of it. so, we refrain from doing any of that, and divert our attention, care and love to artificial tools that will at least pretend to care, which is more than women are capable of. As a side note on the "who is anyone to barge...?" topic: remember that those who complain are 100% simps. They live for societal validation, and nothing more. They hate and fear the idea of a society that won't validate them for peacocking for women. They hate and fear a society that won't validate them for having a collection of girlfriends and sexual affairs. And they don't have the knowledge nor the intelligence to prevent this society from emerging within our current one. So, never lose yourself in arguments with those simps. Always expose the truth, and let them alone, raging without any power to change anything. always show them that we are doing what we want to do, and we don't care about societal validation.

>>6472 >Replicate them without their flaws, and our personal lives will improve. Yeah, I meant making something better than trying to imitate flaws. I don't get the West's obsession to imitate reality or abstract it into an ugly mess or why people torture themselves to make something they don't enjoy. Commies are always reaching their hands into people's stuff to make it suitable for the lowest common denominator and cucks keep bending the knee. Gamedevs can't even make a game now mentioning Taiwan because it's offensive to China and people just accept that. Everybody's gotta appease the most sensitive snowflake. Putting female characters in burkas is almost welcome at this point with how ugly they've made them. All these industries are gonna die a quick death though thanks to their critical review and the idiots listening to them. Maybe people will get fed up enough to finally make their own but I doubt it. People have just enough energy to complain but they don't wanna do anything about it. And that's great for me, they can rage in their echo chambers all they want while I pour some silicone and fuck my H-cup robowaifu. When they ask where are her organs, my succinct reply will be she's a fucking robot.

>>6472 >On that topic, ALWAYS create fake codes in order to deceive authorities. Useless codes that amount to nothing, that you keep around just to hand them over any authority that comes bothering you. Yeah no. I don't think that's what /robowaifu/ is about friend. Our goal here is to spread this tech as far and wide as possible. Thus our MIT licenses. Even Google can use our code if they care to.